Yellen’s Fed faces a tricky rates dilemma in 2017 that may end up tripping up Trump

Editors note: The Federal Reserves policy-setting committeeraised its target interest ratea quarter-point to a range of 0.5 percent to 0.75 percent, only the second such move in eight years. In the widely anticipated decision, the Fedsignaled it anticipatesraising rates another 0.75 percentage point in 2017 likely in three quarter-point hikes a faster pace of tightening than previously expected. We asked two experts to analyze what this will mean for the not too distant future.

Between a rate hike and a hard place

Steven Pressman, Colorado State University

As almost everyone expected, the Fed raised interest rates, and banks will now pass their higher costs on to companies and consumers, leading to higher borrowing rates throughout the economy.

The bigger issue, however, concerns likely increases in 2017. Here the message was somewhat ambiguous. While indicating that three 0.25 percentage point increases were possible in 2017, compared with the previous guidance that only two rate hikes were likely next year, Janet Yellen stressed in her press conference that any changes would be small and remain highly uncertain. She continually noted that the Federal Reserve would have to adjust its thinking in 2017 based on actual economic circumstances.

TheFederal Open Market Committee press releasewas likewise rather ambiguous. It indicated that monetary policy remains accommodative and that future adjustments will depend on the economic outlook and incoming data.

The important takeaway from all this is that it is really not clear what the Fed will do next year. The reason for this is that the Fed is damned if they raise interest rates considerably in 2017 and damned if they dont.

On the one hand, debt remains a Damocles sword hanging over the U.S. economy, and a rise in rates could cut the thread. Household debtis approaching levelsreached before the 2008 financial crisis, which suggests that households may be approaching the point at which they cannot repay their loans something that can bring down banks and the U.S. economy. Andreal median household incomeremains US$1,000 below pre-Great Recession levels and $1,500 below its all-time peak in the 1990s. U.S. households, responsible for 70 percent of all spending in our economy, face a double squeeze that cannot continue.

Worse still,many households remain underwateron their mortgages. Others are slightly above water, unable to come up with the realtor commissions and moving expenses that would let them sell their home and find a more affordable place to live. Higher interest rates will worsen this problem by reducing home affordability and prices.

On the other hand, at some point, perhaps soon, the U.S. economy will enter another recession. If the tax cuts andspending increases proposedby President-elect Trump get enacted, a ballooning budget deficit (made worse by the onset of a recession) will hinder the ability of fiscal policy to create jobs. Interest rate cuts then become our only viable policy tool.

So with rates already near zero, central banks cannot lower them very much. For this reason, they want to load up on ammunition, and push them up some. At the same, time they fear the consequences of doing this. Todays Fed guidance was ambiguous for a good reason they are caught on the horns of a nasty dilemma.

How higher rates will hurt Mexico and tie up Trump

Wesley Widmaier, Griffith University

Donald Trump has promised to build a wall and make Mexico pay. But the Feds decision to continue raising rates higher known as tighter monetary policy may push Trump to send money abroad, even to Mexico, a common target of his scorn on the campaign trail.

History shows that monetary policy decisions can have complex effects.

With a U.S. recovery continuing, the Feds tightening is raising fears of a reaction similar to the1994 Mexican peso crisis. If this happens, the Trump administration may face hard choices.

Just like today, early 1994 saw then-Fed Chair Alan Greenspan move from an easy money stance and resume raising rates.Greenspan arguedthat the stock market was flirting with a bubble, bank earnings were low and inflation might revive. Raising interest rates was seen as the solution to ease the market bubble, pull money back from emerging markets and tamp down on a return of inflation.

However, the Feds moves back then had unexpected effects. Like many middle-income countries today, Mexico had issued dollar-denominated tesobonos to insure against exchange rate risk. But as the Fed raised rates over 1994, Mexico found it harder to make payments on the bonds, prompting a run on the peso.

The U.S.responded with a $50 billion rescue. Dollars had to flow south or a Mexican collapse might send immigrants north.

Of course, this is not a dynamic unique to Mexico. As Fed moves raise the cost of servicing dollar-denominated debts, increased debt-servicing costs could have global repercussions.

However, Mexicos economy has been a subject of some recent concern. If Fed restraint heightens those concerns, Trump may need to forget the wall and pay Mexico instead.

The Conversation



Want to know latest inside moves in business? Subscribe to stay updated.
  • No Records Found!

May 02, 2015 China has again regained its appetite for commodities. Market data shows that ... Read More

May 02, 2015 Crude oil prices have been steadily gaining ground in the international market. ... Read More

May 02, 2015 After the recent announcement that Greece was weeks away from running out of ... Read More

May 02, 2015 Gold prices had dipped 2.3% to lowest monthly close in April last month. Silver ... Read More